OpenAI fires three safety researchers following sensitive information policy dispute
OpenAI has dismissed three AI safety researchers following allegations that they violated internal policies regarding the handling of sensitive information.
FTMQ Security, written by our newsroom0 views

OpenAI dismissed three safety researchers on October 9, 2026, after an internal investigation concluded they violated policies regarding sensitive information, SecurityWeek and Benzinga reported. SecurityWeek identified the three employees as Tomek Korbak, Jasmine Wang, and Mikita Balesni. OpenAI stated in a post on X that it parted ways with the staff members due to a breach of trust, according to SecurityWeek. [1][6]
The terminations followed a dispute in which the three researchers accused OpenAI of prioritizing corporate interests over artificial intelligence safety, SecurityWeek and NDTV Profit reported. The trio had posted a letter directed to the various safety oversight bodies at OpenAI prior to their dismissal, according to SecurityWeek. [1][3]
ABC News, CT Insider, and Pluang also reported that the firings stemmed from an ongoing dispute over AI risks. OpenAI defended the dismissals by stating that the researchers committed a breach of trust by violating clear policies on handling sensitive information, SecurityWeek reported. [1][2][4][5]
Safety disputes have previously disrupted leadership at the company. In November 2023, OpenAI's board briefly ousted chief executive Sam Altman over concerns regarding his handling of artificial intelligence safety and commercialization before reinstating him days later. [8]
In short
- OpenAI fired safety researchers Tomek Korbak, Jasmine Wang, and Mikita Balesni.
- OpenAI stated the researchers violated clear policies on handling sensitive information.
- The dismissals occurred after the researchers accused OpenAI of prioritizing corporate interests over safety.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]OpenAI Fires 3 Safety Researchers in Dispute Over AI RisksSecurityWeek, 5h ago (the report this story comes from)
- [2]OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers in dispute over AI risksABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos, 13h ago
- [3]OpenAI Defends Firing 3 Researchers After AI Safety Concerns Spark ControversyNDTV Profit, 14h ago
- [4]OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers over trust br...Pluang, 9h ago
- [5]OpenAI fires 3 safety researchers in dispute over AI risksCT Insider, 15h ago
- [6]OpenAI Says Three Departing Researchers Violated Sensitive Information Policies Amid Safety DisputeBenzinga, 7h ago
Background
- [7]AI takeover on Wikipedia
- [8]Removal of Sam Altman from OpenAI on Wikipedia
- [9]Safety on Wikipedia
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 9 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
More in Top Stories
- FBI arrests suspect linked to ShinyHunters breach of job portal2h ago
- Hackers abuse Google Ads and Bing redirects in Claude ClickFix attacks2h ago
- EY Data Breach Exposes Information of Goldman Sachs and Man Group Clients1d ago
- FBI seizes seven domains used by Chinese hacking group Flax Typhoon1d ago
- Attackers hijack top level domains to obtain unauthorized Google security certificates2d ago
- Discord security bot Double Counter breached exposing user email addresses2d ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.

Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.